The Vaccine-Autism Connection

( Part 3 of 4 )

Dr. Rashid Buttar, DO, FAAPM, FACAM, FAAIM

Dr. Rashid Buttar discusses the vaccine-autism link in terms of mercury toxicity and the biological aspects of mercury poisoning and autism.

Dr. Buttar practices in Charlotte, NC where he is the medical director of Advanced Concepts in Medicine, a clinic specializing in treating cancer, heart disease and other chronic conditions in patients refractory to conventional treatments, with a special emphasis on the interrelationship between metal toxicity and insidious disease processes.

Source:

http://www.autismmedia.org/

http://www.whale.to/vaccines.html

http://www.drbuttar.com/

*TAGS*

Thimerosal vaccine dangers autism connection mercury poisoning toxicity
Immunization childhood diseases death fatality fatal demise mortality rate
*
medical research study clinicinal investigate explore analysis investigation
dosage physiology etiology epidemiology politics brain damage coma toxic shock
*
methyl-mercury damage severe irreversible brain damage genocide profit chemical
warfare chelation therapy allergies eliminate heavy metals jab inoculation toxicology
*
epidemiological tests studies speech delay adhd add dpso autistic behavior characteristics genetics dna learning disabilities link vaccine information and awareness
*
Dr. Rashid Buttar
*
The Octomedia Channel

Duration : 0:4:20


[youtube LkChs4xHvy0]

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

22 Responses to “Part 3: The Vaccine-Autism Connection”

  1. mjr256 says:

    Buttar is a fraud …
    Buttar is a fraud who has actually been barred from treating children and cancer patients. He’s even admitted that he had no empirical evidence for his claims; he simply “believes” vaccines cause autism despite overwhelming evidence that he is wrong & takes money from desperate parents turning to him for treatments he claims will cause their children to “recover” even though there is no known method for “curing” this condition. Please consult your pediatrician or other medical professional.

  2. Haden1113 says:

    A Hippie? Sorry …
    A Hippie? Sorry that was before my time. I guess you are old and bitter. Try to pray to God for understanding how our children are blessed not bad for having autism. They are without sin and very loved by God.

  3. amiriliano says:

    Please watch my new …
    Please watch my new video “Vaccine Myths 2 – The Great Graph Illusion”

    Thanks

  4. elucidatus says:

    Medicaid? LMFAO!!! …
    Medicaid? LMFAO!!! Haden please learn all that you can first about insurance and what your insurance company will and will not cover before you talk about it. I mean what are you a hippy? All we need is love? Tell that to your insurance company when they won’t even cover a small percentage of your child’s therapies.

  5. Haden1113 says:

    Medicaid should pay …
    Medicaid should pay for services and anything else has to be donations among the community to help support your attempts to “fix” your child. But love is all they need that happens to be free.

  6. nmste says:

    Think about it how …
    Think about it how expensive is it to do the kit and kaboodle???? the expensive whole foods, g/free, c/free diet, the chelation, the supplements to replenish, the OT, the speech therapy, and any other extra activity you can think of, the candida issue, on and on, they don’t want to pay for that

  7. nmste says:

    Ok, I am going to …
    Ok, I am going to just get right to the point,
    here it is, again
    doctors do not want to admit that chelation and supplements work because,,,,drumroll
    If they do then the private insurance companie and medicaid will have to pay. chelation takes expertise, monitoring and periodic testing, it is costly and since the medical INDUSTRY is bent on pillpushing, it is cheaper to dope them up and say nothing more can be done

  8. vaccinesharmbabies says:

    My friend Sharon’s …
    My friend Sharon’s son who became autistic as a result of vaccination reverted back to normal after the vaccine mercury was detoxed from his body. Check out Sharon’s comments at the end of my personal profile by clicking on ‘vaccinesharmbabies’.

  9. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    For a particular …
    For a particular child the effort put forth can be eclectic, but be careful to not state what causes what when doing such research unless you’ve got evidence. Still without data carry on if it is working, just like pray without ceasing is fine too. If your successful stories are always with ABA too, why be so attacking towards me?

  10. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    You offer video. I …
    You offer video. I ask for a research article which your own words imply, but there isn’t one.

  11. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    You write the …
    You write the following, but I ask for more than a fiction book. Give me an article with population study because that is what you are implying with “Believe me when I say this & we have video proof that children who are on a protocol either with a DAN Doctor or with a General practitioner get better results that are retainable than a child on ABA alone!” ABA proved “retainable” by the way on a population without DAN. Have you?

  12. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    EnigmaAutism,


    EnigmaAutism,

    Get over myself? I ask a doctor to show evidence and somehow because I dare to ask the doctor I am full of myself. Did you know that those who get better service come prepared with their questions? Try it sometime.

  13. EnigmAutism says:

    How can you explain …
    How can you explain that something is not working? I mean could it be the supplements alone? the diet itself? or a combination of one of the above with chelation therapy? The answer is we don’t know. Could it be that these children are getting better as they age? possibly but then again you cannot say that his TD-DMPS is not working. You want proof? You will just have to wait and see. We know for sure that ABA alone is not as effective as ABA in conjunction with prayer and a good protocol.

  14. EnigmAutism says:

    Dear ABAisSCIENCED, …
    Dear ABAisSCIENCED,

    You need to get over yourself because we already know that ABA is effective but how effective is it when a child is not on supplements or on the GF/CF Diet or perhaps doing some type of chelation? Believe me when I say this and we have video proof that children who are on a protocol either with a DAN Doctor or with a General practitioner get better results that are retainable than a child on ABA alone!

  15. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    Davidchenard,


    Davidchenard,

    Look above for more, but when one presents they should start with proof or go back to the labratory. Unless he is willing to admit he’s talking about snake oil right now.

  16. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    Davidchenard, ( …
    Davidchenard, (continued)

    There are over 600 articles published in peer reviewed journals that demonstrate the efficacy of ABA teaching strategies for children with ASD. 16 of these articles are studies showing “indistinguishable” as possible. Are we evaluating how many of your single cases also did ABA during those two years? Many interventions are riding on coat tails.

    Why not ask for proof? That’s all I did.

  17. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    davidchenard,

    I …
    davidchenard,

    I did not reply to you with an article because you asked for a cure. If you don’t take the below as a cure reference and rather a functioning possibilities study, then the point is that no one anywhere has conducted even one study to prove any treatment of toxicity as valid. That is a problem and it needs to be remedied by scientific inquiry like other scientific inquiries otherwise we stay at the point of hypothesis and hot air. Along with people pinning hopes on hot air.
    MORE

  18. davidchenard says:

    Now that I …
    Now that I explained my point, can you answer the question? If yes, then what are they? If not, then what is your point in asking him to provide a “research article” to promote his hypothesis? The scientific method has an order, and it doesn’t start with proof. People aren’t “speaking hot air” if you don’t get it, and why would my question require support to be asked? Can you answer or not? Say yes or no.

  19. davidchenard says:

    Oh I see. Research …
    Oh I see. Research articles must be provided by other people to support their arguments, but they aren’t when the argument is yours. My point was that the lack of published findings that support a cure hypothesis for anything will be hard to find, and the lack of any doesn’t disprove a hypothesis or suggest it is inaccurate. Clearly a case must be made for repeated testing of a hypothesis before articles can be produced that support it. He doesn’t claim anything proven.

  20. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    What is your point? …
    What is your point? I did not even talk about a cure. I asked for a research article. Can you reference one? If not then it is merely talk. It appears you are speaking hot air as leukemia was a death sentence in the past and now it is not. You don’t need a research article for that one.

  21. davidchenard says:

    Can you name two …
    Can you name two research articles that support the hypothesis that specific treatment provides the cure to a serious or life threatening disease? What cures do you ever prescribe for an ailment? I’m not talking about masking symptoms of a disease – I mean a cure. You aren’t allowed to cure anything. If you ever start curing a disease, you will be stopped.

  22. ABAisSCIENCE says:

    Your a doctor …
    Your a doctor surely it should come as no surprise that I would say the next time you put an hour program on you mention a research article.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>